Publication Ethic

This is the statement of publication ethics for Authors, Editors, and Reviewers who contribute in Management Sustainable Development Journal who published by Management Program Study, Institute of Shanti Bhuana:

Authors

  1. Article is not reviewed or published in other journals 
  2. Authors are only allowed publish their work elsewhere after receiving a formal rejection from the journal
  3. If any errors in the article which published in the journal, authors must inform the Editor in Chief to retract the article for correction
  4. Article must be original work and do not contain plagiarism

 Reviewers

  1. Reviewers can refuse to review the submission due to conflict of interest or inadequate knowledge
  2. Reviewers must do the review objectively
  3. Reviewers should ensure the submission article is the original work and be alert to any plagiarism
  4. Must allocated the time for review process, reviewers can requests for extension the review process to the Editor in Chief if needed
  5. Must not discuss the content of the submission without permission.

Editorial Board Members

  1. Review any submission article instead for the plagiarism check which assigned to them by Editor in Chief
  2. Make a decision for article to enter the review stage 
  3. Assign the reviewer to review the article in review stage 
  4. Review the article on copy editing stage
  5. Continuously support and promote the journal.

Chief Editor

  1. Evaluate manuscripts fairly and solely on their intellectual merit.
  2. Ensure confidentiality of manuscripts and not disclose any information regarding manuscripts to anyone other than the people involved in the publishing process.
  3. Has the responsibility to decide when and which articles are to be published.
  4. Actively seek the views of board members, reviewers and authors on how to improve/ increase the image and visibility of the journal.
  5. Give clear instructions to potential contributors on the submission process and what is expected of the authors.
  6. Ensure appropriate reviewers are selected/ identified for the reviewing process.