THE INTEGRATION OF A BALANCED SCORECARD MODEL AND RISK MANAGEMENT ISO 31000:2018 TO IMPROVE SAVINGS AND LOANS COOPERATIVE’S PERFORMANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46229/msdj.v6i2.771Keywords:
Balanced Scorecard; Risk Assessment; Risk Credit; Risk Liquidity; ISO 31000Abstract
This study aimed to integrate the Balanced Scorecard and enterprise risk management processes based on ISO 31000 at Pamona Timur Savings and Loans Cooperative (SLC). The data were obtained through questionnaires and in-depth interviews which were conducted with the Head of the Cooperative. This research was a case study research involving leaders in each stage of the ISO 31000-based risk assessment process, which includes how to identify, analyze, evaluate, and mitigate risks in the case of Pamona Timur Savings and Loans Cooperative. The identified risks consisted of four types of risk, namely: credit risk, liquidity risk, business risk, and operational risk. Based on the results of the risk assessment, the highest risks were credit risk and liquidity risk. These two risks require priority to be addressed immediately. The risk mitigation plan was expected could help to overcome the risks by determining the best risk treatment options that would provide added value to Pamona Timur Savings and Loans Cooperative
References
Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Beasley, M., Chen, A., Nunez, K., & Wright, L. (2006). Working Hand in Hand: Balanced Scorecards and Enterprise Risk Management. Strategic Finance, 49–56.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
Farokhi, S., & Roghanian, E. (2018). Determining quantitative targets for performance measures in the balanced scorecard method using response surface methodology. Management Decision, 56(9), 2006–2037. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2017-0772
Gladies Monica, E., & Pangeran, P. (2020). The Integration of Balanced Scorecard and ISO 31.000 Based Enterprise Risk Management Process to Mitigate Supply Chain Risk: Case Study at PT Anugerah Bintang Meditama. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(10), 616–628. http://ijmmu.comhttp//dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i10.2181
Guenther, T. W., & Heinicke, A. (2019). Relationships among types of use, levels of sophistication, and organizational outcomes of performance measurement systems: The crucial role of design choices. Management Accounting Research, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2018.07.002
Hanafi, M. (2021). Manajemen Risiko. In UPP STIM YKPN. UPP STIM YKPN.
Hansen, E. G., & Schaltegger, S. (2016). The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2340-3
Hoyt, R. E., & Liebenberg, A. P. (2011). The Value of Enterprise Risk Management. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(4), 795–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2011.01413.x
IBI, I. B. I. (2017). Manajemen Risiko 1. In Gramedia Pustaka Utama (Issue December).
ISO. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 - Risk Management - Guidelines. In Organización Internacional de Normalización.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets Into Tangible Outcomes. In Harvard Business Review. Harvard Business Review.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. In Harvard Business Review. Harvard Business School Press.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001a). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I. In Accounting Horizons (Vol. 15, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2001.15.1.87
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001b). Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part II. Accounting Horizons, 15(2), 147–160.
Khaled, M. H. B., & Al-Oun, S. S. (2020). Strategic Planning Using Balanced Scorecard an Experience by Al Al-Bayt University, Jordan. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 9(4), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarafms/v9-i4/6763
Mishra, B. K., Rolland, E., Satpathy, A., & Moore, M. (2019). A framework for enterprise risk identification and management: the resource-based view. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(2), 162–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-12-2017-1751
Nocco, B. W., & Stulz, R. M. (2006). Enterprise Risk Management: Theory and Practice. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2006.00106.x
Ratri, A. M., & Pangeran, P. (2020). Relationship Balanced Scorecard and COSO 2013 Risk Management to Improve Performance: A Case Study on BPR Chandra Mukti Artha Bank. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(1), 566–576.
Richardson, D. C. (2002). PEARLS: Monitoring System. World Council of Credit Unions, 4.
Safitri, R., & Pangeran, P. (2020). Balanced Scorecard and ISO 31000, Risk Management Integration to Improve Performance: Case Study at Indonesian Credit Union. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(6), 527. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i6.1802
Susilo, L. J., & Kaho, V. R. (2018). Manajemen Risiko Berbasis ISO 31000 Untuk Industri Non Perbankan. PPM Manajemen.
Zaki, E., Bah, R., & Rao, A. (2011). Assessing probabilities of financial distress of banks in UAE. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/17439131111144487
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Management and Sustainable Development Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright @2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium. Copyrights of all materials published in MSDJ are freely available without charge to users or / institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, search, or link to full-text articles in this journal without asking by giving appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. All of the remixes, transform, or build upon the material must distribute the contributions under the same license as the original.
