Decision Support System for Scoring In Informatics Engineering Practicum Assistant With Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) Method Web 2.0 Based
Abstract
Abstract— In this modern era, the assessment of an individual with other individuals is still in the subjective stage, a human being assesses the abilities of other humans by using various points of view. Likewise, what Pratikan did to his Pratikum Assistants gave them an assessment that was in accordance with what they had, but the assessment sometimes had different parameters so that the conclusions between one person and another were different, there was no similarity in judging one person.
With the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method, the problem can be solved with the help of this method. Websites that have become part of social life and are closely integrated in daily activities. So using the SAW method, one of the alternatives in the assessment can provide a Pratikum Assistant.
The results obtained from these values can provide a new perspective on various kinds of problems. Deciding that no Practicum Assistant can be reused or the results of a given Assessor can help create a new resolution to the pattern of scoring in Practicum Assistants.
References
M. Kamariotou and F. Kitsios, “Decision support systems and strategic planning: information technology and SMEs’ performance,” Int. J. Decis. Support Syst., vol. 3, no. 1/2, p. 53, 2018, doi: 10.1504/ijdss.2018.10015479.
P. M. Kusumantara, M. Kustyani, and T. Ayu, “ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN METODE SAW DAN WP PADA SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN WEDDING ORGANIZER DI SURABAYA,” Tek. Eng. Sains J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 19–24, 2019.
A. Setya Putra, D. Rahma Aryanti, and I. Hartati, “Seminar Nasional Teknologi dan Bisnis 2018 IIB DARMAJAYA Bandar Lampung,” 2018.
A. Mutaqin, A. Prasetya Wibawa, and U. Pujianto, “21. SaKTI Ali Mutaqin MODEL ANALISIS PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN PEMINATAN DI SMA MENGGUNAKAN METODE SAW,” 2016.
S. Hendartie, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Calon Dosen STMIK Palangkaraya,” J. SAINTEKOM, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 126, 2017, doi: 10.33020/saintekom.v7i2.28.
I. Riyansuni and J. Devitra, “Analisis Dan Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Pangan Non Tunai ( BPNT ) Dengan Simple Additive Weighting ( SAW ) Pada Dinas Sosial Kota Jambi,” J. Manaj. Sist. Inf., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 151–163, 2020.
Fatkhurrochman and D. Astuti, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode Topis Dan Saw Dalam Penentuan Penerima Bantuan Pengembangan Rumah Masyarakat Kurang Mampu,” Semnasteknomedia Online, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 2-8–67, 2018.
A. Kurniawan and Kusrini, “Analisis Dan Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Guru ( Pkg ) Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting ( Saw ) Pada Sd Negeri 1 Wonoroto,” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Multimed. 2016. STMIK AMIKOM. Yogyakarta., pp. 6–7, 2016.
I. Ramadhan and U. Zaky, “Method Comparison Analysis Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) With Weighted Product (Wp) Method in Supporting the Decision To Accept New Employees,” Int. J. Eng. Technol. Nat. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 11–17, 2020, doi: 10.46923/ijets.v2i1.66.
L. S. Ramdhani, D. Qomara, E. Mutiara, and J. M. Hudin, “Analisis Pemilihan Rekomendasi Produk Asuransi Jiwasraya Berdasarkan Kebutuhan Nasabah Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw),” Swabumi, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 167–176, 2021, doi: 10.31294/swabumi.v9i2.11371.
I. Darmayanti, K. Kusrini, and A. Nasiri, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Dalam Menentukan Keluarga Miskin Di Banyumas,” J. Ilm. IT CIDA, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 44–55, 2019, doi: 10.55635/jic.v4i2.85.
Copyright (c) 2022 Liyando Hermawan Hasibuan, Achmad Arif Munaji, Agatha Deolika, Nadya Chitayae
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.